A Proposed approach for multipath routing in IoT Network using FIS
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Multipath routing in Internet of things network using fuzzy logic approach to minimize energy consumption, End-to-End delay and ETX (Expected transmission count).Consider the three parameter as input to improve Quality of service for low power and lossy network. We propose a fuzzy Multi-Criteria decision making to select best next hop to reach destination node from multipath routing and also apply fuzzy inference system to display the outcome by applying membership function. We also give priority to the route which will help to select best path from multiple path. The high performance routing protocol is required to IoT sensor nodes that work on limited battery power which will eliminate the problem of energy constrained. This will improve network performance to increase network lifetime. The implementations in Fuzzy logic to design RPL objective function and obtained result in MATLAB tool to choose best solution
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
pingale, reena, & Dr S N Shinde. (2022). A Proposed approach for multipath routing in IoT Network using FIS. International Journal of Next-Generation Computing, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.47164/ijngc.v13i2.351
References
- Al-Turjman, F. 2017. Energy-aware data delivery framework for safety-oriented mobile iot.
- IEEE Sensors Journal 18, 470–478.
- Amol V. Dhumane, R. S. P. 2019. Multi-objective fractional gravitational search algorithm
- for energy efficient routing in iot. wireless networks,. 25, 399–413.
- C, A. V. 1995. Fuzzy logic applications in europe, in j. yen, r. langari and l. a. zadeh
- (eds.)industrial applications of fuzzy logic and intelligent systems. IEEE Press.
- Chen M Wang, J Lin K Wu, D. W. J. P. L. and C.H, Y. 2016. Multipath planning based
- transmissions for iot multimedia sensing. n 2016 International Wireless Communications
- and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), 339–344.
- D. Miorandi, S. Sicari, F. D. P. and Chlamtac, I. 2012. Internet of things: Vision,
- applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks Vol.10, No.1497-1516.
- et al, S. W. 2012. Rpl: Ipv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. RFC 6550,
- IETF.
- J D. N. Quoc, N. L. and Guo, D. 2017. A hybrid fault-tolerant routing based on
- gaussian network for wireless sensor network. Communications and Networks doi:
- 23919/JCN.2021.000028.
- L. Chen, B. Hu, Z. H. G. L. Z. and Shen, X. 2018. Meta-reinforcement learning for adaptive
- multipath routing optimization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning
- Systems doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070584
- Michael Frey, Friedrich Grose, M. G. 2014. Energy-aware ant routing in
- wireless multi-hop networks. IEEE International Conference on Communications
- doi:10.1109/ICC.2014.6883317, 190–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2014.6883317
- S. Channamma, M. Bhuvaneshwari, M. P. and Jayalakshmi, J. 2016. Routing, application
- and research challenges in iot. ICRIET.
- T., Z. J. T. J. W. and F., C. 2018. Energy-efficient data-gathering rendezvous algorithms with
- mobile sinks for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks 23,
- –257.
- Thubert, U. 2012. Objective function zero for the routing protocol for low-power and lossy
- networks (rpl). RFC 6552,Internet Engineering Task Force.
- Waheb A. Jabbar, W. K. S. and Ismail, M. 2018. A multicriteria-based hybrid multipath
- protocol for energy-efficient and qos-aware data routing in manet-wsn convergence scenarios
- of iot. IEEE Access 6, 76546–76572.
- Xu, L. D. 2014. Internet of things in industries : A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial
- Informatics Vol.10, 2233–2243.
- Yicong Tian, R. 2010. An improved aomdv routing protocol for internet of things. International
- Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering Vol.10, 1–4.
- Z.Amandeep Kaur, G. S. 2017. Comparison of aomdv, dsr and mdart multipath routing
- protocols. 10, 961–967.