A Proposed approach for multipath routing in IoT Network using FIS

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

reena pingale
Dr S N Shinde

Abstract




Multipath routing in Internet of things network using fuzzy logic approach to minimize energy consumption, End-to-End delay and ETX (Expected transmission count).Consider the three parameter as input to improve Quality of service for low power and lossy network. We propose a fuzzy Multi-Criteria decision making to select best next hop to reach destination node from multipath routing and also apply fuzzy inference system to display the outcome by applying membership function. We also give priority to the route which will help to select best path from multiple path. The high performance routing protocol is required to IoT sensor nodes that work on limited battery power which will eliminate the problem of energy constrained. This will improve network performance to increase network lifetime. The implementations in Fuzzy logic to design RPL objective function and obtained result in MATLAB tool to choose best solution


##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
pingale, reena, & Dr S N Shinde. (2022). A Proposed approach for multipath routing in IoT Network using FIS. International Journal of Next-Generation Computing, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.47164/ijngc.v13i2.351

References

  1. Al-Turjman, F. 2017. Energy-aware data delivery framework for safety-oriented mobile iot.
  2. IEEE Sensors Journal 18, 470–478.
  3. Amol V. Dhumane, R. S. P. 2019. Multi-objective fractional gravitational search algorithm
  4. for energy efficient routing in iot. wireless networks,. 25, 399–413.
  5. C, A. V. 1995. Fuzzy logic applications in europe, in j. yen, r. langari and l. a. zadeh
  6. (eds.)industrial applications of fuzzy logic and intelligent systems. IEEE Press.
  7. Chen M Wang, J Lin K Wu, D. W. J. P. L. and C.H, Y. 2016. Multipath planning based
  8. transmissions for iot multimedia sensing. n 2016 International Wireless Communications
  9. and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), 339–344.
  10. D. Miorandi, S. Sicari, F. D. P. and Chlamtac, I. 2012. Internet of things: Vision,
  11. applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks Vol.10, No.1497-1516.
  12. et al, S. W. 2012. Rpl: Ipv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. RFC 6550,
  13. IETF.
  14. J D. N. Quoc, N. L. and Guo, D. 2017. A hybrid fault-tolerant routing based on
  15. gaussian network for wireless sensor network. Communications and Networks doi:
  16. 23919/JCN.2021.000028.
  17. L. Chen, B. Hu, Z. H. G. L. Z. and Shen, X. 2018. Meta-reinforcement learning for adaptive
  18. multipath routing optimization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning
  19. Systems doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070584
  20. Michael Frey, Friedrich Grose, M. G. 2014. Energy-aware ant routing in
  21. wireless multi-hop networks. IEEE International Conference on Communications
  22. doi:10.1109/ICC.2014.6883317, 190–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2014.6883317
  23. S. Channamma, M. Bhuvaneshwari, M. P. and Jayalakshmi, J. 2016. Routing, application
  24. and research challenges in iot. ICRIET.
  25. T., Z. J. T. J. W. and F., C. 2018. Energy-efficient data-gathering rendezvous algorithms with
  26. mobile sinks for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks 23,
  27. –257.
  28. Thubert, U. 2012. Objective function zero for the routing protocol for low-power and lossy
  29. networks (rpl). RFC 6552,Internet Engineering Task Force.
  30. Waheb A. Jabbar, W. K. S. and Ismail, M. 2018. A multicriteria-based hybrid multipath
  31. protocol for energy-efficient and qos-aware data routing in manet-wsn convergence scenarios
  32. of iot. IEEE Access 6, 76546–76572.
  33. Xu, L. D. 2014. Internet of things in industries : A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial
  34. Informatics Vol.10, 2233–2243.
  35. Yicong Tian, R. 2010. An improved aomdv routing protocol for internet of things. International
  36. Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering Vol.10, 1–4.
  37. Z.Amandeep Kaur, G. S. 2017. Comparison of aomdv, dsr and mdart multipath routing
  38. protocols. 10, 961–967.