Investigation of AODV Routing Protocol Using RDPA and UDPA

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Nov 15, 2021
https://doi.org/10.47164/ijngc.v12i4.387
Download
Requires Subscription PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 12, Issue 4, November 2021

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

SAURABH SHARMA
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION, UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD
Alok Singh
Department of Electronics and Communication, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, India
Rajneesh Kumar Srivastava
Department of Electronics and Communication, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, India

Abstract




The node deployment technique in Mobile Ad Hoc networks plays a vital role in the evaluation of a routing protocol. In this paper, the performance of Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol has been investigated using Uniform and Random Disc Position Allocators offered by NS-3 as Initial Position Allocator as well as Next Position Allocator along with random waypoint mobility model. The simulation results exhibit that AODV routing protocol performs better in case of random disc position allocator as compared to uniform disc position allocator where performance metrics are taken as the Average End-to-End Delay, Throughput and Packet Delivery Ratio.




 

 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
SHARMA, S., Alok Singh, & Rajneesh Kumar Srivastava. (2021). Investigation of AODV Routing Protocol Using RDPA and UDPA. International Journal of Next-Generation Computing, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.47164/ijngc.v12i4.387
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. AHMED, S. AND FAROOQ, M.O. 2017. Analysis of access network selection ane switching metrics for LTE and WiFi HetNets. 2017 International Conference on Selected Topics in Mobile and Wireless Networking (MoWNeT), IEEE, 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MoWNet.2017.8045948
  2. AL-QARAAWI, S.M., SALMAN, A.D., AND IBRAHIM, M.S. 2019. Performance evaluation of ad- hoc based aerial monitoring system. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN) 7, 4, 1794–1800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i4.899
  3. BAI, F. AND HELMY, A. 2004. A SURVEY OF MOBILITY MODELS in Wireless Adhoc Networks. Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, 1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-8705(03)00040-4
  4. BUGARCIC, P.D., MALNAR, M.Z., AND JEVTIC, N.J. 2018. Performance Analysis of MANET Networks Based on AODV Protocol in NS-3 Simulator. 2018 26th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), IEEE, 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TELFOR.2018.8612100
  5. CHEN, Y. AND LIU, W. 2021. MAC Layer Energy Consumption and Routing Protocol Optimization Algorithm for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Complexity 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6687189
  6. DAS, A.X. AND SRIVASTAVA, R.K. 2019. INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE ROUTE TIMEOUT AND DELETE PERIOD CONSTANT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF AODV ROUTING PROTOCOL. Journal of Analysis and Computation ( JAC) 12, 1, 1–11.
  7. DODDAMANI, L.M., YARAGOP, S.M., CHIKARADDI, A., AND KANAKARADDI, S. 2016. Energy consumption comparison of AODV and DSDV routing protocols. International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques, ICEEOT 2016, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2128–2132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7755066
  8. GARG, M., GUPTA, A., KAUSHIK, D., AND VERMA, A. 2020. Applying machine learning in IoT to build intelligent system for packet routing system. Materials Today: Proceedings. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.539
  9. GHOSH, S. AND BANERJEE, A. 2021. ARMA Model Based Anycast AODV (ARMA-AAODV) for Performance Improvement in Scalable Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks 28, 2, 199–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-021-00505-y
  10. GILUKA, M.K., PASCA, T.V., RAJORIA, N., AND TAMMA, B.R. 2018. On Efficient Scheduling of H2H Traffic and Reducing Signaling Overhead due to Uplink Small Data M2M Traffic in LTE-A Networks. Wireless Personal Communications 103, 2, 1791–1818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5881-4
  11. GILUKA, M.K., RAJORIA, N., KULKARNI, A.C., SATHYA, V., AND TAMMA, B.R. 2014. Class based dynamic priority scheduling for uplink to support M2M communications in LTE. 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things, WF-IoT 2014, IEEE Computer Society, 313–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WF-IoT.2014.6803179
  12. GRAJZER, M. AND GLABOWSKI, M. 2014. On IPv6 experimentation in wireless mobile ad hoc networks. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology (JTIT) 3/2014, 71–81.
  13. KANELLOPOULOS, D. AND CUOMO, F. 2021. Recent developments on mobile ad-hoc networks and vehicular ad-hoc networks. Electronics (Switzerland) 10, 4, 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10040364
  14. KAUR, R., SRIVASTAVA, A., CHATTERJEE, B.C., MITRA, A., AND RAMAMURTHY, B. 2018. Performance Analysis of Fairness Oriented Dynamic Bandwidth Algorithm in Integrated Fiber-Wireless Architecture Based on XG-PON and Wi-Fi. 2018 20th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), IEEE, 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2018.8473632
  15. KHAN, M.F. AND DAS, I. 2020. Implementation of Random Direction-3D Mobility Model to Achieve Better QoS Support in MANET. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 11, 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0111026
  16. KHAN, M.F. AND DAS, I. 2021. Analysis of Various Mobility Models and Their Impact on QoS in MANET. 131–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0407-2_10
  17. LIU, C., ZHANG, G., GUO, W., AND HE, R. 2020. Kalman Prediction-Based Neighbor Discovery and Its Effect on Routing Protocol in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 21, 1, 159–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2889923
  18. MOURSY, I., ELDERINI, M., AND AHMED, M. 2017. FTRP: A Fault Tolerant Reliable Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. SENSORCOMM 2017 : The Eleventh International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications, 24–30.
  19. MOURSY, I., ELDERINI, M., AND AHMED, M. 2017. A Novel Routing Fault Tolerant Reliable Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors & Transducers 218, 12, 10–18.
  20. MOZUMDER, A.H., ACHARJEE, T., AND ROY, S. 2014. Scalability performance analysis of BATMAN and HWMP protocols in wireless mesh networks using NS-3. Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Green Computing, Communication and Electrical Engineering, ICGCCEE 2014, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGCCEE.2014.6921389
  21. NS-3, D. ns-3: ns-3 Documentation. https://www.nsnam.org/doxygen/. OKTAVIANA, A., PERDANA, D., AND NEGARA, R.M. 2018. Performance Analysis on IEEE 802.11ah Standard with Enhanced Distributed Channel Access Mechanism. CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal 12, 1, 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v12i1.3908
  22. PATTNAIK, P.K., PANDA, B.K., AND SAIN, M. 2021. Design of novel mobility and obstacle- aware algorithm for optimal MANET routing. IEEE Access 9, 1–1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3101850
  23. PERKINS, C.E. AND ROYER, E.M. 1999. Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. Proceedings WMCSA’99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, IEEE, 90–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSA.1999.749281
  24. REYNOLDS, M.B. 2016. Uniform points on disc, circle, sphere and caps. MBR blog.
  25. ROHRER, J.P., ÇETINKAYA, E.K., NARRA, H., BROYLES, D., PETERS, K., AND STERBENZ, J.P.G. 2011. AeroRP performance in highly-dynamic airborne networks using 3D Gauss- Markov mobility model. Proceedings - IEEE Military Communications Conference MILCOM, 834–841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2011.6127781
  26. ROY, R.R. 2011. Handbook of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for Mobility Models. Springer US, Boston, MA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6050-4
  27. SHARMA, N. AND CHAKRAWARTI, R.K. 2014. Simulation for congestion-less losses control over MANET using TCP scheme. 2014 International Conference on Issues and Challenges in Intelligent Computing Techniques (ICICT), IEEE, 410–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICICT.2014.6781317
  28. SINGH, A., SHARMA, S., AND SRIVASTAVA, R.K. 2020. Investigation of random waypoint and steady state random waypoint mobility models in NS-3 using AODV. Journal of High Speed Networks Preprint, 1, 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JHS-200643
  29. SINGH, D. AND GHOSH, S.C. 2019. Mobility-Aware Relay Selection in 5G D2D Communication Using Stochastic Model. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 68, 3, 2837–2849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2019.2893995
  30. SIRMOLLO, C.Z. AND BITEW, M.A. 2021. Mobility-Aware Routing Algorithm for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6672297
  31. SWAIN, P. AND BABU, B.N. 2017. Video streaming over HetNets with LTE-WiFi integration in radio level. 2017 Conference on Information and Communication Technology (CICT), IEEE, 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOMTECH.2017.8340588
  32. TANEJA, D.K., TANEJA, D.H., AND KAUR, R. 2021. Evolutionary Computation Techniques for Intelligent Computing in Commercial Mobile Adhoc Network. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEXT-GENERATION COMPUTING 12, 2.
  33. TUTORIAL. Tutorial. https://www.nsnam.org/docs/release/3.29/tutorial/singlehtml/index.html.