Recommendation of Hypervisors for System Resources Intensive Application Workloads based on their Performance in the Private Cloud

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Vijaya Vardhan Reddy
Lakshmi Rajamani

Abstract

Hypervisors enable cloud computing model to provide scalable infrastructures and on-demand access to computing resources as they support multiple operating systems to run on one physical server concurrently. This mechanism enhances utilization of physical server thus reduces server count in the datacenter hence driving the benefits of reduced IT infrastructure setup and maintenance costs along with power savings. The paper evaluates the system resources (CPU, Memory, Network, and Disk I/O) performance of three hypervisors, namely ESXi, XenServer and KVM in a CloudStack environment using the SIGAR-Framework for consolidated application workloads with concurrently running virtual machines. Based on the results, the paper recommends the hypervisors suitability for system resources intensive applications. The three hypervisors are carefully chosen to represent three categories (full virtualized, para-virtualized, and hybrid virtualized). We have created a private cloud using open source cloud computing software CloudStack. Hypervisors are deployed as hosts in the CloudStack in the respective clusters. Consolidated workloads are generated using open source load generator tools on multiple virtual machines of hypervisors and important system resources information is gathered using SIGAR framework.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Vijaya Vardhan Reddy, & Lakshmi Rajamani. (2015). Recommendation of Hypervisors for System Resources Intensive Application Workloads based on their Performance in the Private Cloud. International Journal of Next-Generation Computing, 6(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.47164/ijngc.v6i1.75

References

  1. Barham, P., Dragovic, B., Fraser, K., Hand, S., Harris, T., Ho, A., Neugebauer, R., Pratt, I., and Warfield, A. 2003. Xen and the art of virtualization. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating systems Principles (New York, 2003). ACM Press, New York, 164177.
  2. Buyya, R., Yeo, C.S., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., and Brandic, I. 2009. Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. In Future Generation Computer Systems, Elsevier B. V.
  3. FUJITSU. 2010. Benchmark Overview-vServCon.
  4. FUJITSU. 2010. Benchmark Overview-vServCon. Last Accessed March, 2010.
  5. Fujitsu Technology Solutions. 2007. DataSheet Citrix XenServer.
  6. Fujitsu Technology Solutions. 2007. DataSheet Citrix XenServer. 2007.
  7. Hostway UK. 2011. VMware ESXi Cloud Simplified. Comprehensive explanation of the features and benefits of VMware ESXi Hypervisor. http://www.hostway.co.uk/small-business/dedicated-hosting/cloud/vmware-esxi.php. 2011.
  8. Jianhua, C., Qinming, H., Qinghua, G., and Dawei, H. 2008. Performance Measuring and Comparing of Virtual Machine Monitors. Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing. In EUC'08. 2008.
  9. Mell, P., and Grance, T. 2009. The NIST De nition of Cloud Computing. In National Institute of Standards and Technology, Information Technology Laboratory. Version 15, 10-7-09.
  10. Menon, A. 2005. Diagnosing Performance Overheads in the Xen Virtual Machine Environment. In Conference on Virtual Execution Environments (VEE'05). 2005
  11. Moller, K.T. 2007. Virtual Machine Benchmarking. In Diploma Thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 2007. 2007
  12. Nanda, S., and Chiueh,T. 2005. A Survey on Virtualization Technologies. In Technical report, Department of Computer Science, SUNY at Stony Brook. (New York, 2005.) 11794-4400.
  13. SIGAR. 2012. https://support.hyperic.com/display/SIGAR/Home. 2012.
  14. CLOUDSTACK. 2014. http://cloudstack.apache.org. 2014.
  15. MYSQLSLAP. 2009. http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/mysqlslap.html. 2009.
  16. HTTPERF. 2008. http : ==www:hpl:hp:com=research=linux=httperf=: 2008.
  17. JMETER. 2012. http : ==jmeter:apache:org=: 2012.
  18. NETPERF. 2012. http : ==www:netperf:org=netperf=: 2012.
  19. PASSMARK. 2014. http : ==www:passmark:com=products=pt:htm: 2014.
  20. SPEC. Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. 2014. http : ==http : ==www:spec:org=: 2014.
  21. SPECvirt sc2010 Design Overview. http : ==www:spec:org=virtsc2010=: last accessed on May 23, 2011.
  22. Reddy V V, P., and Rajamani,L. 2014. Performance Comparison of Hypervisors in the Private Cloud. In Advanced Computing, Networking and Informatics,vol.2,2014.DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-07350-7 44. http :==link:springer:com=chapter=10:1007%2F978