Machine Learning Techniques for Quality Management in Teaching Learning Process in Higher Education by Predicting the Student's Academic Performance

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 31, 2022
https://doi.org/10.47164/ijngc.v13i3.837
Download
Requires Subscription PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 13, Special Issue 3, October 2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Meenakshi .
Assistant Professor,GD GOENKA UNIVERSITY SOHNA HARYANA
Domenic T. Sanchez
Larry B. Peconcillo, Jr.
Cebu Technological University-NEC, Philippines
John V. De Vera
Cebu Technological University-NEC, Philippines
Dr. Rupali Mahajan
MIT ADT University, Loni , Pune, India
Dr. Tribhuwan Kumar
Assistant Professor of English,College of Science and Humanities at Sulail, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj - 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Dr. Amol A Bhosle
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Engineering,, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune,India

Abstract

The process of teaching and learning is the most powerful tool that teachers and professors have, because it is the main way that students change in the ways that teachers and professors want them to. TQM is recommended as a way to control, monitor, and improve the quality of teaching and learning strategies in the classroom. In line with the principles of TQM, evaluations of things like results and feedback are used to improve teaching and learning. The level of academic success that a program's students have may say a lot about how good that programme is. You can predict how well a student will do in school in the future by looking at how well they did in the past. After more research, it might be possible to find a link between the students' grades and their skills and interests. When teachers have this kind of information, they are better able to focus on the students who are having the most trouble. This article shows how to use feature selection and machine learning to improve the quality of teaching and learning in higher education by predicting how well a student will do in school. The performance of university students is used as an input to a classification model. First, ant colony optimization is used to choose the most important features. Then, KNN, Naive Bayes, and decision tree algorithms are used to classify the chosen data. Based on accuracy, recall, and F1 score, KNN performs better.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
., M., Sanchez, D. T. ., Peconcillo, Jr. , L. B. ., Vera, J. V. D. ., Dr. Rupali Mahajan, Kumar, D. T. ., & Bhosle, D. A. A. . (2022). Machine Learning Techniques for Quality Management in Teaching Learning Process in Higher Education by Predicting the Student’s Academic Performance. International Journal of Next-Generation Computing, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.47164/ijngc.v13i3.837
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. N. Tomasevic, N. Gvozdenovic, and S. Vranes, ‘‘An overview and comparison of supervised data mining techniques for student exam performance prediction,’’ Comput. Educ., vol. 143, Jan. 2020, Art. no. 103676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103676
  2. Veluri et al., "Learning analytics using deep learning techniques for efficiently managing educational institutes", Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 51, pp. 2317-2320, 2022. Available: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.416
  3. F. Yang and F. W. B. Li, ‘‘Study on student performance estimation, student progress analysis, and student potential prediction based on data mining,’’ Comput. Educ., vol. 123, pp. 97–108, Aug. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.006
  4. Raghuvanshi, A., Singh, U., Sajja, G., Pallathadka, H., Asenso, E., & Kamal, M. et al. (2022). Intrusion Detection Using Machine Learning for Risk Mitigation in IoT-Enabled Smart Irrigation in Smart Farming. Journal of Food Quality, 2022, 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2022/3955514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3955514
  5. B.-H. Kim, E. Vizitei, and V. Ganapathi, ‘‘GritNet: Student performance prediction with deep learning,’’ 2018, arXiv:1804.07405. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.07405
  6. F. Marbouti, H. A. Diefes-Dux, and K. Madhavan, ‘‘Models for early prediction of at-risk students in a course using standards-based grading,’’ Comput. Educ., vol. 103, pp. 1–15, Dec. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.005
  7. M. Kumar, A. J. Singh, and D. Handa, ‘‘Literature survey on educational dropout prediction,’’ Int. J. Educ. Manage. Eng., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 8–19, Mar. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2017.02.02
  8. Gupta, A., 2013, July. Performance insight 360: a cloud-based quality management framework for educational institutions in India. In 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics (pp. 139-144). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2013.28
  9. V. Durga Prasad Jasti, Abu Sarwar Zamani, K. Arumugam, Mohd Naved, Harikumar Pallathadka, F. Sammy, Abhishek Raghuvanshi, Karthikeyan Kaliyaperumal, "Computational Technique Based on Machine Learning and Image Processing for Medical Image Analysis of Breast Cancer Diagnosis", Security and Communication Networks, vol. 2022, Article ID 1918379, 7 pages, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1918379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1918379
  10. Jayasingh B. B. , H. Kumar and G. Aishwarya, “Inquiry based inductive learning practices in engineering education: A classroom study”, IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), Madurai, pp. 60-65, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2016.022
  11. Sharabiani A., F. Karim, A. Sharabiani, M. Atanasov, and H. Darabi, “An enhanced Bayesian network model for prediction of students' academic performance in engineering programs”, IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 832 – 837, 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826192
  12. Yadav, S., Bharadwaj, B., & Pal, S. (2012). Mining Education Data to Predict Student's Retention: A comparative Study. International Journal Of Computer Science And Information Security, 10(2), 113-117.
  13. Basari, G., Altinay, Z., Dagli, G., & Altinay, F. (2016). Assessment of the Quality Management Models in Higher Education. Journal Of Education And Learning, 5(3), 107-118. DOI: 10.5539/jel.v5n3p107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p107
  14. O. Dervišević, E. Žunić, D. Ðonko and E. Buza, "Application of KNN and Decision Tree Classification Algorithms in the Prediction of Education Success from the Edu720 Platform," 2019 4th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech), 2019, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.23919/SpliTech.2019.8783102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech.2019.8783102
  15. Eswara Rao, P., & Sankar, S. (2017). Survey on Educational Data Mining Techniques. International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science. DOI: 10.18535/ijecs/v6i4.41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18535/ijecs/v6i4.41
  16. Kavitha, G., & Raj, L. (2017). Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics - Educational Assistance for Teaching and Learning. International Journal Of Computer & Organization Trends, 41(1), 21-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14445/22492593/IJCOT-V41P304
  17. Mesarić, J., & Še alj, D. (2016). Decision trees for predicting the academic success of students. Croatian Operational Research Review, 7(2), 367-388. DOI: 10.17535/crorr.2016.0025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17535/crorr.2016.0025
  18. Dhanalakshmi, V., Bino, D., & Saravanan, A. (2016). Opinion mining from student feedback data using supervised learning algorithms. In 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (pp. 1-5). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDSC.2016.7460390
  19. Sekhar, L.C., Vijayakumar, R. (2021). Feature Selection Using Ant Colony Optimization and Weighted Visibility Graph. In: Bhateja, V., Peng, SL., Satapathy, S.C., Zhang, YD. (eds) Evolution in Computational Intelligence. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1176. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5788-0_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5788-0_3
  20. E. Ergün and O. Aydemir, "Firefly Algorithm Based Feature Selection for EEG Signal Classification," 2020 Medical Technologies Congress (TIPTEKNO), 2020, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/TIPTEKNO50054.2020.9299273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIPTEKNO50054.2020.9299273
  21. J. D. Kanchana, G. Amarasinghe, V. Nanayakkara and A. S. Perera, "A Data Mining Approach for Early Prediction Of Academic Performance of Students," 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology & Education (TALE), 2021, pp. 01-08, doi: 10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678558
  22. M. Arifin, Widowati, Farikhin, A. Wibowo and B. Warsito, "Comparative Analysis on Educational Data Mining Algorithm to Predict Academic Performance," 2021 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic), 2021, pp. 173-178, doi: 10.1109/iSemantic52711.2021.9573185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/iSemantic52711.2021.9573185
  23. I. A. Abu Amra and A. Y. A. Maghari, "Students performance prediction using KNN and Naïve Bayesian," 2017 8th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), 2017, pp. 909-913, doi: 10.1109/ICITECH.2017.8079967. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/university DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITECH.2017.8079967