Human-Machine Convergence and Disruption of Socio-Cognitive Capabilities

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 31, 2022
https://doi.org/10.47164/ijngc.v13i3.893
Download
Requires Subscription PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 13, Special Issue 3, October 2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dr Amaresh Jha
Associate Professor, School of Modern Media University of Petroleum and Energy Studies Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Dr Sanjeev Ratna Singh
Associate Dean, School of Modern Media University of Petroleum and Energy Studies Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Dr Meenakshi .
Assistant Professor, School of Mediaand Entertainment GD Goenka University, India

Abstract

People who have access to smartphone or computers are already using AI. A complex set of algorithm works in search engines, social networking sites, voice recognition applications, navigation applications, OTT platforms and video games. Human-machine convergence has been made possible because of the science and technology. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning are the contemporary technologies which is being used in several sectors for better precisions like medical diagnostics, remote sensing etc. There is a tremendous amount of potential for AI and ML to help individuals develop their mental and interpersonal skills. Since quite some time, researchers have been looking at what effect, if any, artificial intelligence may have on the decision-making process of humans. In the same way that it is used in the decision-making processes of the scientific and corporate communities, artificial intelligence is also being employed in the legal and gambling industries. Software and algorithms based on artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to simulate human behaviour and predict its effects. Many people are of the opinion that artificial intelligence will improve the quality of human judgement and decision making, particularly in high-stakes circumstances like war. Investigating the structural, relational, and cognitive bases of artificial intelligence's function as a facilitator of decision-making is the goal of this line of study.


 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Jha, D. A., Singh, D. S. R. ., & ., D. M. (2022). Human-Machine Convergence and Disruption of Socio-Cognitive Capabilities . International Journal of Next-Generation Computing, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.47164/ijngc.v13i3.893
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aleksander, I. and Morton, H. 2007. Computational studies of consciousness. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)68007-8
  2. Campos, T. P. S., Bezerra, C. W. A. G., and da Silva, S. P. 2021. Artificial intelligence and human psychology: Present reality and future possibilities. Asian Journal of Sociological Research, 29–34.
  3. Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. and Wanberg, C. R. 2003. Unwrapping the organizational entry process: disentangling multiple antecedents and their pathways to adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 5, 779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.779
  4. Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D., and Fox, A. K. 2020. Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. Journal of Business Research 120, 262–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.045
  5. Makasi, T., Tate, M., Desouza, K. C., and Nili, A. 2021. Value–based guiding principles for managing cognitive computing systems in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review 44, 4, 929–959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1879883
  6. Miller, G. A. 2003. The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in cognitive sciences 7, 3, 141–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9
  7. Saks, A. M. and Ashforth, B. E. 1997. Organizational socialization: Making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. Journal of vocational Behavior 51, 2, 234–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1614
  8. Satell, G. 2018. How to make an ai project more likely to succeed. Harvard Business Review July, 2018.
  9. Signorelli, C. A. M. 2017. Types of cognition and its implications for future high-level cognitive machines. In 2017 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
  10. Signorelli, C. M. 2018. Can computers overcome humans? consciousness interaction and its implications. In 2018 IEEE 17th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI* CC). IEEE, 61–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCI-CC.2018.8482038
  11. Williams, J., Fiore, S. M., and Jentsch, F. 2022. Supporting artificial social intelligence with theory of mind. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.750763
  12. Zajko, M. 2021. Conservative ai and social inequality: conceptualizing alternatives to bias through social theory. AI & SOCIETY 36, 3, 1047–1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01153-9